With the continuous iteration of smart door locks,freedeuceswildvideopokernodownload, there are many smart door locks equipped with cameras on the market. The biggest feature of these smart door locks is that when abnormal conditions such as trial opening and long-term stay occurfreedeuceswildvideopokernodownload, the camera will automatically record videos, which users can view through the mobile app.
However, a consumer named Sun in Beijing was sued in court for installing such a camera smart door lock. According to CCTV news reports, Sun and his neighbor Zhang are adjacent homes. Because the entrance doors of the two houses form a right angle, Zhang must pass by Sun's door.
One day, Zhang discovered that Sun had installed a smart door lock with a camera. He believed that this violated his privacy rights and sued his neighbor to the court to request the smart door lock to be removed.
After hearing the incident, the Beijing Fengtai Court ruled that although the electronic lock camera installed by Sun did not directly capture Zhang and his family members, its shooting scope included the public corridor in front of the door. Considering that this corridor belongs to a social public space, and the people passing through it are relatively specific and clearly limited to the two families living around it-namely, the resident family surnamed Zhang and the resident family surnamed Sun.
Therefore, under normal circumstances, these two families should have the right to privacy protection of this personal information. However, because the video videos recorded and stored by smart door locks involve personal privacy information that neighbors 'homes do not want others to know, they pose a threat and violation of their privacy rights. Therefore, according to the judge's determination, the judgment required Sun to remove the smart door lock installed by him.
This case aroused heated discussion among netizens. Some netizens said: "Only I think my home is safe like this?" and "I hope everyone around my home will install it so that I will feel safe." Some netizens also believe that this is one of the classic cases: "Protecting citizens 'privacy rights."